Update 4/10/2014 - The TIA will remove "tiers" from its data center benchmarking.
Many data centers advertise themselves as a specific Tier, based on a scale from I – IV. But these classes are generally poorly defined and in many cases misused. Case in point: Green House Data recently exhibited at an industry event in Denver. A man walked up to the table and started asking about the company’s data centers.
“You guys are up in Cheyenne, right?” he said, “What kind of facility? Tier II? Tier III?”
“We meet the standards for Tier III, yes,” I replied. “99.9% availability.”
“Raised floors?” he continued. I shook my head.
“It has to have raised floors to be Tier III,” the man said with certainty.
In actuality, raised floors are only required in some circles. Different accreditations use extremely similar tiers, with several key differences. This blog aims to set the record straight, spelling out what is included in each tier from two major accreditation organizations.
The two main data center tier classifications were developed by the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) and the Uptime Institute (UI). Each uses Tier I, II, III and IV to describe various levels of reliability and infrastructure design in the data center, but they diverge in several key ways. The basic idea, however, remains the same: an enterprise-class data center must be designed with redundant components and backup systems in order to avoid downtime, even during maintenance periods.
The Uptime Institute consists of a group of companies who perform IT services and consulting for the data center industry. They first created their Tier system in 1995. TIA was formed in 1988, born from other telecommunications industry organizations stretching back to 1923. They released their Telecommunications Infrastructure Standards for Data Centers in 2005. Both standards stipulate some other requirements for cabling, floor layout and more, but the main points align nicely:
|Class||TIA-942 Standard||Uptime Institute Standard|
Tier III -
|Tier IV - Fault Tolerant||
The two class systems look quite similar, with a main difference being those tricky raised floors, which can be a source of debate among data center designers. In the past, raised floors were the preferred method. They solved a number of issues including:
Request more information from the experts.
In many modern cases a raised floor can actually cause extra problems. Cooling is still a major focus for data centers, but new standards like hot/cold aisle containment and new high efficiency air chillers placed close to IT cabinets have eliminated the need for raised floors as a cooling method. In fact, the increased wattage of modern IT equipment necessitates a raised floor of 1m or more in many cases, dramatically increasing the cost and considerations needed for a raised floor implementation. Cables are much smaller than they once were and can be run across the ceiling, where they are also easier to access. Ground shift is no longer much of an issue, and direct cold water piping is no longer necessary. Utility pipes can also be run overhead. Earthquake/disaster resiliency, headroom, fire codes, decreased security, cleaning and increased cost are all deterrents to a raised floor system.
Raised floors serve as just one example of the fast moving data center world, where yesterday’s best practices become today’s legacy nonsense. While a raised floor solution can still provide an effective and secure Tier IV data center, they aren’t necessary to achieve the highest rating.
Green House Data is proud to meet the standards for a concurrently maintainable Tier III data center with 99.9% availability, but the company also recognizes that the only way to be truly fault tolerant is to stay on top of the latest trends in design and technology and to maintain constant vigilance through monitoring and security measures.
Read more about data center tiers and raised floors:
Posted By: Joe Kozlowicz